Sitename
  • Home
  • News
  • Staff
    • L. Carson Bise
    • Paul S. Tischler
    • Dwayne Guthrie
    • Christopher Cullinan
    • Julie Herlands
    • Stephanie Ball
    • Meredith Hill
    • Taylor Yewell
  • Professional Services
    • Fiscal Impact Analyses
      • Growth Alternatives Analyses
      • Development Proposals
      • Annexation Proposals
        • Deerfield Beach, FL
        • Dublin, OH
        • Germantown, TN
        • Kissimmee, FL
        • Wilmington-New Hanover, NC
      • Fiscal Equity Studies
    • Impact Fees
    • Utility Rate Studies
    • Revenue Enhancement/Infrastructure Financing Strategies
    • User Fees/Cost of Service Studies
    • Cost Allocation Plans
    • Capital Improvement Plans
    • Economic Impact and Market Analyses
      • Bridgewater, NJ
      • City of Coolidge, AZ
      • City of Little Rock, AR
      • Memphis, TN
      • Montgomery County, MD
      • Newton, MA
      • Shenandoah University, VA
      • Toledo, OH
      • University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
      • Washington, DC
    • Fiscal Software
  • Newsletters
  • Publications
  • Client List
  • Contact Us

Annexation Proposals

 

Kissimmee, Florida Annexation Proposal Analysis

Growth is continuing to occur on the western boundary of the City of Kissimmee, Florida. Given this continuing development, including a proposed mixed-use convention center development, the potential for the City to annex will diminish over time.

 

TischlerBise's marginal cost fiscal impact analysis for the City included three annexation areas, or fiscal analysis zones (FAZs). Each of these annexation areas is unique. For example, FAZ 1 is vacant land, where the proposed mixed-use convention center is proposed, FAZ 2 is largely developed, but has the potential to accommodate a limited amount of new development, and FAZ 3 is largely undeveloped. Within each FAZ, two scenarios were evaluated, a base case and an optimistic scenario. In addition, for each scenario there were two development time schedules: trends and slower development.

 

The analysis concluded that annexing any of the three FAZs would result in net revenues to the City. However, FAZ 1 produces the best result because of the scale of development contained in the proposed mixed-use project and associated off-site development. FAZ 2 produces the second best result because of its large existing taxable base ($456 million), which is 44% of the existing City base. FAZ 3 produced the third best result because revenues received from the existing development base are not enough to cover the up-front operating costs incurred for Police protection and Road maintenance.

About Annexation Proposals

It is generally fairly easy to calculate the additional revenues accruing from annexation, it is usually much more difficult to ascertain the public sector costs.

 

Professional Services


Additional Information


TischlerBise


Fiscal Impact Analyses

Impact Fees
Utility Rate Studies
Revenue Enhancement/Infrastructure Financing Strategies
User Fees/Cost of Service Studies
Cost Allocation Plans
Capital Improvement Plans
Economic Impact and Market Analyses
Fiscal Software

Home

Staff

Newsletters

Publications

Client List

Contact Us

4701 Sangamore Road S240
Bethesda, MD 20816


(800) 424-4318 Ext. 12
FAX: (301) 320-4860

 

Copyright © 2012 TischlerBise.

All Rights Reserved.
Site by Corti Designworks